Skip to main content
· 3/31/1987

McCourt v. JC Penney Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 696
  • 103 Nev. 101
  • 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing alternative design is a factor for determining whether a product is unreasonably dangerous
  • recognizing alternative design is a factor for determining whether a product is unreasonably dangerous
  • “where the facts are sharply disputed and the matter is tried to the jury, and there is proper foundation shown, the court should allow the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.