McCorquodale v. Kemp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Any activity seeking to solicit political contributions necessarily interferes with that function by competing with the merchant tenants for the funds of [mall] patrons.\
• “Any activity seeking to solicit political contributions necessarily interferes with that function by competing with the merchant tenants for the funds of [mall] patrons.”
• judicial construction of statutory aggravating circumstance could be applied retroactively because defendant not subjected to change in quantum of punishment
• Standridge left question open, holds defendant not denied basic tools of defense
• asMng the jury if the victim had any constitutional guarantees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).