Skip to main content
· 8/18/2000

McCormick v. Gober

Citations

  • 14 Vet. App. 39
  • 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 858
  • 2000 WL 1173791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that VBA Letter 20-99-60 was binding VA issuance although not adopted after notice and opportunity for public comment
  • holding that VBA Letter 20-99-60 was binding VA issuance although not adopted after notice and opportunity for public comment
  • distinguishing Morton in cases where VA has failed to obtain SMRs or VA medical records prior to receiving well-grounded claims
  • remanding with orders to BVA to correct three separate and distinct errors, each of which could have served as independent remand ground
  • remanding to BVA for it to address initially “questions [raised for first time to this Court that] are peculiarly within the competence of VA to address”
  • remanding to BVA for it to address initially “questions [raised for first time to this Court that] are peculiarly within the competence of VA to address”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Ivers, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.