McCormick v. Camp Pocono Ridge, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior FCC ruling regarding vicarious liability under section 227(b) was not entitled to Chevron defer ence because it contradicted the TCPA’s plain language
• holding franchisor’s “right to terminate the agreement . . . in no way 11 establishes a right to control the store’s operations”
• holding that TCPÁ does not permit vicarious liability
• defining “implied consent” as “[cjonsent inferred from one’s conduct rather than from one’s direct expression”
• finding plaintiff did not make a sufficient showing of defendant’s control over its alleged agent to sustain a claim of vicarious liability under section 227(b) of the TCPA
• “With regard to the right of action created under [subsection 227(c)(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).