McCormick v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the Johnson rule, the plaintiff lacked a claim for abuse of process, because \there was no attempt on the part of [the defendant] or his partners to use the process for purposes of extortion\ (emphasis added)
• indicating that abuse of process would have been supported had there been an ulterior motive as to either the plaintiff or the actual debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).