McCormack v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State’s normal plowing procedures satisfied its duty and did not include insuring against snow “sloughing off” into the road
• suggesting that the State might have had an elevated duty if there had been abnormal accumulations
• discussing the effects “sloughing off” from a snowbank can have on a road

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lane v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-23· cited 22×
• Douglas E. Samuelson and Kevin L. Samuelson v.Cecil E. McMurtry, M.D. - Dissenting
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-09-06
• Turmel v. Univ. of Vt.
  Vermont Superior Court· 2004-04-20
• Hornbostel v. S. Burlington Sch. Dist.
  Vermont Superior Court· 2004-02-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-11-13· cited 51×
• Gilbert v. Churchill
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-02· cited 12×
• Cain v. Houston General Ins. Co.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1976-04-27· cited 12×
• Valentino v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-04-13· cited 8×
• Fitzhugh v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1963-10-21· cited 7×
• Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Deuso
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-12-13· cited 5×
• Graham v. Rudison
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-07-11· cited 3×