McCormack v. Hankscraft Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting requirement of privity in claims for personal injury based on breach of express warranty as it serves to eliminate bars to consumer recovery imposed by the law of sales
• plaintiff presented evidence that the cover of a vaporizer should have been secured such that it would prevent water in the vaporizer’s jar from simultaneously discharging if the vaporizer should tip over
• plaintiff presented evidence that the cover of a vaporizer should have been secured such that it would prevent water in the vaporizer's jar from simultaneously discharging if the vaporizer should tip over
• in which we adopted Restatement, Torts 2d, § 402A
• privity of contract not necessary for a products liability claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).