Skip to main content

McCorkle v. State

Citations

  • 619 A.2d 186
  • 95 Md. App. 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the crucial question for manifest necessity due to witness unavailability is whether the prosecution was aware of witness unavailability at the time jeopardy attaches
  • explaining that the crucial question for manifest necessity due to witness unavailability is whether the prosecution was aware of witness unavailability at the time jeopardy attaches
  • noting the missing witness was key, with \both parties ha[ving] made extensive references to this witness's expected testimony\ during their opening statements
  • affirming trial judge's exercise of sound discretion in declaring mistrial when key witness became ill and did not appear during trial and State prosecution was unable to locate witness despite doing everything it could to get witness to court
  • affirming trial judge's exercise of sound discretion in declaring mistrial when key witness became ill and did not appear during trial and State prosecution was unable to locate witness despite doing everything it could to get witness to court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Alpert, Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.