McCorkle v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n
Citations
- 107 La. 461
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>A street car, propelled by electricity and moving at a moderate speed, is run into at a corner by a covered beer wagon, the driver of which, occupying a seat from which his view upon either side is obstructed by the cover of the wagon, drives his mules at a brisk pace along the street which intersects the car tracks, and practically into the car, before looking up or down the track: held, upon the facts proven, the driver was at fault and the motorman is entitled to recover from the driver’s employer for personal injuries resulting from the collision.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[C]ombustion emissions are an indirect effect of an agency's decision to extract ... natural resources.\
- “[C]ombustion emissions are an indirect effect of an agency’s decision to extract . . . natural resources.”
- “It is arbitrary and capricious for a government agency to use estimates of energy output for one portion of an EIS, but then state that it is too speculative to forecast effects based on those very outputs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.