McCord v. Spradling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Ridgway solely on the grounds that SGLIA contained an anti- attachment provision
• “while the federal courts have held that FEGLIA preempts state equitable actions, such is not the case with a large majority of state courts that have addressed this issue,” including Texas, North Carolina, Illinois, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).