· 7/23/2002
McConkey v. Aon Corp.
Citations
- 804 A.2d 572
- 354 N.J. Super. 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
- adopting, with some editing, the Commission’s analysis why its procedures did not violate the judges’ right to procedural due process
- finding that Plaintiff’s fraud claim was not barred by the parole evidence rule because it was “not a case where the contract provisions contradicted oral assurances on the same subject, thereby nullifying all prior oral and written agreements between the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Eichen, Lintner and Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.