Skip to main content
· 9/21/1904

McConaghy v. Clark

Citations

  • 35 Wash. 689
  • 77 P. 1084
  • 1904 Wash. LEXIS 498

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Validity — Construction — Carrying United States Mail — Substitution of Contractors — Consent and Approval of Government — Failure of Proof — Nonsuit. In an action for damages for breach of a contract to substitute the defendant for the plaintiff in a sub-contract for carrying the United States mail, a nonsuit is properly granted on the ground that the complaint fails to state sufficient facts, and that the proof was insufficient, where it is not alleged or proved that the original contractor consented to the substitution or that the postmaster general authorized and approved the same, it appearing from the contract that such consent and approval were necessary.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying after-acquired title doctrine to the “successor to the original mortgagee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.