McComber v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the law of the case bars a party from raising an issue in a second appeal that was decided in the first appeal between the same parties
• finding no violation of OCGA § 17-8-57 in court’s pre-evidentiary charge that “State will introduce evidence in support of the charges contained in the indictment”
• finding no violation of OCGA § 17-8-57 in court’s pre-evidentiary charge that “ ‘State will introduce evidence in support of the charges contained in the indictment’ ”
• addressing the law of the case rule in a criminal case
• an issue raised and decided on appeal from the first trial of a case may not be raised again on appeal after the case was remanded and tried for a second time
• “judicial comments ‘limited to a clarification of procedures [that] do not address the credibility of witnesses or any fact at issue in the trial’ do not violate OCGA § 17-8-57”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).