McComb v. Tamlyn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conflicting expert testimony about whether intersection’s design complied with MUTCD where state argued that adopting MUTCD was a policy choice precluded directed verdict for the state on discretionary immunity grounds
• determination whether the construction of an intersection signal complies with MUTCD is not subject to discretionary immunity
• provisions of MUTCD do not require traffic engineer to use particular signal in designing specific intersection because manual vests city engineer with discretion in making such decisions
• state did not carry its burden on the issue of discretionary immunity where evidence did not establish that an earlier policy judgment actually governed the acts and omissions at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).