· 12/30/1964
McClure v. United States Lines Co.
Citations
- 247 F. Supp. 272
- 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inferring dilatory motive where, among other things, plaintiff sought leave to amend to assert claims that “relate[d] back to facts in existence when the case was filed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.