McClure v. Galvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to speculate “as to all of the other conceivable ways in which the state could have set up its framework”
• “[T]he Supreme Court has suggested something of a sliding scale approach and has noted that there is no ‘bright line’ to separate unconstitutional state election laws from constitutional ones.”
• Storer v. Brown, supra at 734, “held that a potential candidate was not significantly burdened by a statute that forced him to think ahead one full year before becoming an independent candidate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).