McClure Pine Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is a general duty of good faith for insurers that stems from 9 the fiduciary relationship with the insured, as explained in Tank
• holding that an insured may 6 maintain a bad faith claim for investigation of the insured’s claim and violation of Consumer 7 Protection Act even if the insurer was ultimately correct in determining coverage did not exist
• holding, however, that a first party insured is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption of harm
• noting that “an insured is not entitled to base a bad faith or [Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW] claim against its insurer on the basis of a good faith mistake”
• finding that failure to investigate first-party claim was in bad faith
• finding that a reasonable investigation is required before coverage is denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named McClure Pine Co. v. Commissioner

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• McClure Pine Co. v. Commissioner
  Board of Tax Appeals· 1930-08-13