McClung v. Atlanta Real Estate Acquisitions, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• document intended as exhibit to agreement, but not attached thereto at the time executed, could not be considered part of the agreement itself
• agreement was unenforceable when it failed to designate any particular tract or lot intended to be conveyed
• “if a contract contains even a vague description of the property’s location, that description will open the door to extrinsic evidence.... There must, however, be some indication within the contract itself of the location of the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).