McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant waived review of trial court’s ruling in limine that his journals were admissible for impeachment purposes when journals were never actually admitted into evidence due to his refusal to testify on cross-examination
• “[B]ecause the [evidence] that the trial court held would be admissible [was] never actually admitted into evidence . . . , [a]ny error the court may have made in 10 that ruling in limine was . . . not preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).