Skip to main content
· 11/2/1868

McCloy v. Maffett's Administrator

Citations

  • 59 Pa. 344
  • 1868 Pa. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that there are “innumerable cases in which the word ‘void’ when used in statutes, ordinances, and in a variety of other contexts has been interpreted to mean ‘voidable.”’
  • observing that there are “innumerable cases in which the word ‘void’ when used in statutes, ordinances, and in a variety of other contexts has been interpreted to mean ‘voidable.”’
  • “The term ‘void’ is properly applied to those contracts that are of no effect whatsoever, whereas a ‘voidable’ contract can be cured by the act or confirmation of one of the parties.” (citation omitted)
  • “The word ‘void’ is not always used with technical precision.”
  • “The word ‘void’ is not always used with technical precision.”
  • “It is true that there is an important technical distinction between Void’ and ‘voidable’: The term ‘void’ is properly applied to those contracts that are of no effect whatsoever, whereas a ‘voidable’ contract can be cured by the act or confirmation of one of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew, Read, Shahs, Thompson, Williams, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.