McCloy v. Allen
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1704
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by granting appellee's motion for summary judgment on appellant's negligence and negligence per se claims where appellant did not set forth any specific facts owing to the existence of a genuine triable issue beyond the mere allegations set forth in her pleadings as required by Civ.R. 56, thus rendering it proper for the trial court to grant summary judgment in appellees' favor on appellant's negligence and negligence per se claims.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In our judgment, the interests which the action seeks to protect are not protected by its existence, and the harm it engenders far outweighs any reason for its continuance.”
- “ ‘[T]he interests which the action seeks to protect are not protected by its existence, and the harm it engenders far outweighs any reason for its continuance.’ ”
- alienation action would be abolished if the court had authority to do so
- court would abolish tort if it had authority to do so
- actions for alienation of affections engender more harm than good
- actions for alienation of affections engender more harm than good
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.