McCloud v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When [the officer] saw what appeared to be crack cocaine in the appellant’s mouth, his suspicion [that the appellant was engaged in criminal activity] was sufficiently confirmed to supply him with probable cause to seize the substance”
• “When [the officer] saw what appeared to be crack cocaine in the appellant’s mouth, his suspicion [that the appellant was engaged in criminal activity] was sufficiently confirmed to supply him with probable cause to seize the substance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Love
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-04-18· cited 133×
• Ex Parte State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2005-04-29· cited 50×
• Holden v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-09-28· cited 15×
• McCoo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-06-25· cited 4×
• Blankenship v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-08-27· cited 2×
• Cottle v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-11-30· cited 2×
• Rhodes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-10-26
• Gipson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-11-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-03-13· cited 416×
• Hairgrove v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-04-14· cited 28×
• Scarbrough v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-10-31· cited 12×