McCloskey v. Honolulu Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that protecting the safety of the public is a compelling-interest served by the police department’s drug testing program and, thus, holding that such drug testing program did “not violate our constitution!,]” specifically, article I, sections 6 and 7
• noting impossibility of detecting drug use by police officers through observation and individualized investigations
• noting impossibility of detecting drug use by police officers through observation and individualized investigations
• Honolulu Police Department employee drug screening program
• drug testing of police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).