Skip to main content
· 7/31/2007

McClendon v. Hudson

Citations

  • 962 So. 2d 90
  • 2007 Miss. App. LEXIS 489
  • 2007 WL 2177909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Connecticut has adopted federal test for represen- tational standing
  • determining subject matter jurisdiction on basis of facts at time that original complaint was filed
  • “[t]o establish standing to raise an issue for adjudication, a complainant must make a colorable claim of direct injury”
  • ‘‘[t]o establish standing to raise an issue for adjudication, a complainant must make a colorable claim of direct injury’’
  • ‘‘[t]he trial court has inherent authority to supervise and man- age the orderly presentation of evidence’’
  • ‘‘we have recognized a limited exception to the rules of standing in order to provide a means of protecting the public’s interest in properly implemented competitive bidding processes’’ (empha- sis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Carlton, Chandler, Griffis, Irving, Ishee, King, Lee, Myers, Only, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.