· 2/9/1989
McClelland v. Herlitz, Inc.
Citations
- 704 F. Supp. 749
- 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 36
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1341
- 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the operative date for limitations purposes is the date the clerk of court initially receives the complaint and the request for leave to proceed IFP”
- noting that “the operative date for limitations purposes is the date the clerk of court initially receives the complaint and the request for leave to proceed IFP”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzwater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.