McClelland v. Baltimore & O. C. T. R. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining need in doctrine of equivalents analysis to consider the role of each limitation in the claimed invention
• “A drafter uses the term ‘comprising’ to mean T claim at least what follows and potentially more.’ ”
• “[T]his court is well aware of the difficulty of granting summary judgment motions on issues requiring delicate balancing of many factual components.... This standard sets a high hurdle which this court does not lightly attempt to surmount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).