Skip to main content
· 3/23/1976

McClellan v. Jantzen

Citations

  • 547 P.2d 494
  • 26 Ariz. App. 223
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “when ‘wildlife, including fish’ and . . . when ‘recreation’ were added to the purposes for appropriation, the concept of in situ appropriation of water was introduced — it appearing to us that these purposes could be enjoyed without a diversion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.