McClellan v. Board of Regents of the State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court “is not at liberty to reevaluate the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the factfinder”
• “Allowing parties to acquiesce in the procedures, but to challenge those same procedures on appeal is inefficient and unreasonable.”
• due process did not require citation to specified regulations in the notice of the administrative hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).