McClees v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing state-law fraud claim under Rule 5 9(b) because the plaintiff “only vaguely identifie[d] the time (‘in or about 2012’ and ‘in or 6 about March 2014’) of the alleged misrepresentations and fail[ed] completely to identify 7 the places”
• plaintiff alleged that “the 5 || man who replaced her” received higher pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).