Skip to main content
· 11/11/1889

McCleery v. Thompson

Citations

  • 130 Pa. 443
  • 18 A. 735
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1208

Syllabus

<p>1. A judgment confessed by one partner m the firm name, though for a firm debt, is void against the others, but is good against the partner confessing it, and under it partnership goods may be taken in execution. Grier v. Hood, 25 Pa. 480; Ross v. Howell, 84 Pa. 129.</p> <p>2. Yet, where, after a partnership has been dissolved, such a note is executed by one partner and judgment entered thereon, the judgment against the firm and the other partner will be stricken off, even though the obligation was given for a partnership indebtedness to the plaintiffs.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Sovereign immunity does not preclude an assessment of costs against the Commonwealth where the underlying suit was not barred[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.