McCleaf v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “[t]he Delaware Supreme Court’s reliance on Rummel was consistent with the Supreme Court’s pronouncements in both Lockyer and Ewing.”
• defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge evidence supporting forgery conviction where defendant signed arrest card with a false social security number, birthdate, name, and scar/tattoo information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).