McClanahan v. Trent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the conclusion of an examining psychiatrist is a medical conclusion, one which the BVA is not free to ignore or disregard
• “On this record, this Court is left with the ‘definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ” (quoting United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 541-42, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).