McClanahan v. McGill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “Anti-Injunction Act prevents federal courts from 20 enjoining pending state court litigation unless the case satisfies a specific statutory exception.”
• explaining that the “Anti-Injunction Act prevents federal courts from 5 enjoining pending state court litigation unless the case satisfies a specific statutory exception.”
• “The 9 power of a state to determine the custody of its youngest members is unique to the state, and 10 accordingly federal courts should abstain from interference.”
• “The power of a state to determine the custody of its youngest members 20 is unique to the state, and accordingly federal courts should abstain from 21 interference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).