McClam v. Government of the District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Laffey high-end rates” were inappropriate in a case involving fifty-six exhibits and twenty witnesses
• holding that “IDEA cases are generally not complex” and that “Laffey high-end rates cannot be awarded here.”
• explaining that $0.15 is a reasonable rate for copying and faxing in D.C.
• agreeing with the defendant’s objection to the application of Laffey rates by reasoning that the IDEA litigation was not complex
• declining to award enhanced Laffey rates to an IDEA suit with 56 exhibits and 20 witnesses
• awarding reduced rates because the case was not sufficiently complex where a three-day administrative hearing included 41 admitted exhibits and eleven witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).