McClain's Market v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a store owner’s affidavit was insufficient to defeat summary judgment because it “present[ed] no explanation of any of the 149 transactions asserted against plaintiff, but merely present[ed] general justifications for large expenditures”
• granting Government’s motion for summary judgment in SNAP trafficking case where store owner’s “affidavit present[ed| no explanation of any of the 149 transactions asserted against plaintiff, but merely presents general justifications for large expenditures”
• store owner’s “affidavit presents no explanation of any of the 149 transactions asserted against plaintiff, but merely presents general justifications for large expenditures. Any one of the 149 transactions is sufficient to establish a violation.”
• a store owner's affidavit, which was unsupported by any other evidence, presented no direct explanation for any of the transactions flagged by the FNS, but merely asserted general justifications for the transactions and was therefore insufficient to survive summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).