McClain v. Florida Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal was proper when counsel had continually failed to prosecute the client's appeals, even after reprimands from the court and the imposition of monetary sanctions
• holding that dismissal was proper because counsel had continually failed to prosecute his client's appeals timely, despite reprimands by the court and the imposition of monetary sanctions
• holding that dismissal was proper because counsel had continually failed to timely prosecute his client's appeals, despite reprimands by the court and the imposition of monetary sanctions
• holding that dismissal was proper because counsel had continually failed to timely prosecute his client’s appeals, despite reprimands by the court and the imposition of monetary sanctions
• holding that dismissal was proper because counsel had continually failed to timely prosecute his client's appeals, despite reprimands by the court and the imposition of monetary sanctions
• persistent violations and failure to respond to court orders; appeal dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).