Skip to main content
· 1/20/1890

McCauley v. Cremerieux

Citations

  • 132 Pa. 22
  • 18 A. 1070
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 761

Syllabus

<p>[n an action upon a bond executed in part payment of tbe purchase money of a house and lot, it was not error to admit the testimony of the obligor tending to show that the bond, after its delivery, had been satisfied by a sheriffs sale of the property to the plaintiff, in pursuance of a verbal agreement with the plaintiff’s agent that the title should be thus re-transferred, and the bond so discharged; and, the plaintiff’s agent testifying in denial of the defendant’s testimony, an issue of fact was thereby presented which was properly for the jury.</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.