McCaslin v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that interest “is imposed because the employer benefits from the use of the money determined to be due to the employee and because the employee had to do without its use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clifton Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Management Servs.
  Sixth Circuit· 2013-09-24· cited 85×
• Russell v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-11-07· cited 15×
• Burns v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-05-06· cited 10×
• Lulgjuraj v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-09-17· cited 10×
• Crenshaw v. Industrial Commission
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-12-16· cited 4×
• Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-11-18· cited 4×
• Watkins v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-03-08· cited 2×
• Montanez v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-09-04· cited 2×
• Martin v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1980-06-27· cited 117×
• Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1960-01-04· cited 74×
• Drake v. Norge Division, Borg-Warner Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1962-09-10· cited 21×
• Taylor v. Auditor General
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1962-09-07· cited 1×