McCaslin v. Cornhusker State Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a majority of jurisdictions, along with the EEOC and Department of Labor, do not consider prisoners employees
• concluding that an inmate is not an employee because the “prisoner does not enter into a bargain with the prison to become a prisoner in order to be able to work in prison industries, as might a private individual who contracts with an employer”
• municipal prisoner was not employee for workers’ compensation purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).