McCaskill v. Parsons Building & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the language of MCL 205.28(1)(a) does not require proof of delivery or receipt
• \[W]e will not read words into the plain language of the statute.\
• courts should not “read words into the plain language of the statute”
• failure to articulate how statute violates due process constitutes abandonment of argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).