Skip to main content
· 5/19/1952

McCaskill v. Little

Citations

  • 58 So. 2d 801
  • 214 Miss. 331
  • 1952 Miss. LEXIS 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurisdictional question, although not raised by the appellant, was so patent that Court could not ignore it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, McGeh, Alexander, Kyle, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.