· 5/19/1952
McCaskill v. Little
Citations
- 58 So. 2d 801
- 214 Miss. 331
- 1952 Miss. LEXIS 474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that jurisdictional question, although not raised by the appellant, was so patent that Court could not ignore it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, McGeh, Alexander, Kyle, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.