McCarty v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimant’s actions did not amount to misconduct disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits where there was no evidence that claimant deliberately or intentionally acted against her employer’s interests
• holding that claimant's actions did not amount to misconduct disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits where there was no evidence that claimant deliberately or intentionally acted against her employer's interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).