New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/27/1988
McCarty v. State
Citations
- 763 P.2d 360
- 107 N.M. 651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that purpose and intent of notice of alibi rule not frustrated by technical failure to follow rule when prosecution knew alibi witnesses would testify and knew content of testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ransom, Sosa, Walters, Scarborough, Stowers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-05-10· cited 227×
- State v. Le MierNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 79×
- State v. StillsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-03-16· cited 63×
- State v. WatleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-12-28· cited 49×
- Mayeux v. WinderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- Manlove v. TansyTenth Circuit· 1992-12-16· cited 42×
- State v. CampbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-02-26· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-04-15· cited 36×
- Manlove v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-16· cited 35×
- Lawson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 17×
- State v. NgoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-05-16· cited 16×
- State v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-05-29· cited 15×
- United States v. PomarleauCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-09-30· cited 9×
- Watley v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2000-07-10· cited 7×
- State v. KilleanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 6×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 1,055×
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
- Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinSeventh Circuit· 1982-04-14· cited 99×
- United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray and Honorio MontanezFifth Circuit· 1981-03-12· cited 97×
- State v. SimonsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 91×
- Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 76×
- United States v. Dennis Leon BarronNinth Circuit· 1978-05-24· cited 58×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-12-02· cited 48×
- Robert Escalera v. Philip Coombe, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, DefendantSecond Circuit· 1987-08-13· cited 20×
- State v. HorenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 20×
- State v. BergMontana Supreme Court· 1985-04-10· cited 16×
- State v. NunnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-01-25· cited 15×
- People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-02-10· cited 14×
- People v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-03-18· cited 7×
- State v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.