Skip to main content

McCarty v. McCarty

Citations

  • 863 S.W.2d 716
  • 1992 Tenn. App. LEXIS 816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that alimony recipient “should not have to pay the cost of defending her entitlement to alimony . . .”
  • “To be material, the change of circumstances must be shown to have been unforeseeable at the time the decree was entered.”
  • rehabilitative alimony statute does not apply retroactively to alimony awards made prior to its passage
  • rehabilitative alimony statute does not apply retroactively to alimony awards made prior to its passage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Highers, Tomlin, Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.