McCarty v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing district court’s grant of three‐day extension when attorney mistakenly believed that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(e) added three days to the period for filing a notice of appeal
• reversing district court’s grant of three-day extension when attorney mistakenly believed that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(e) added three days to the period for filing a notice of appeal
• also noting that the Eighth Circuit places a burden on the prisoner to prove the prison’s mail delivery procedures are inadequate to be reasonably calculated to notify
• when attorney filed notice of appeal late, his belief that he had three additional days, after the “entry” of judgment, to file under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d
• explaining the excusable neglect standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).