McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs immediate termination of a sales contract, in violation of the contract provision requiring 60 days’ notice, was not a substantial breach barring plaintiffs suit seeking unpaid commissions
• applying the “well-settled tenet of Michigan contract law” that extrinsic evidence may be admitted to identify and interpret a latent ambiguity
• applying the “well-settled tenet of Michigan contract law” that extrinsic evidence may be admitted to identify and interpret a latent ambiguity
• citations omitted.] Therefore, determination of whether a breach of contract is \substantial\ hinges on whether the nonbreaching party obtained the benefit of its contractual bargain. Able Demolition v Pontiac, 275 Mich App 577, 585; 739 NW2d 696 (2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).