McCarthy v. Nandalall (In Re Nandalall)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hile § 727(d)(1) requires a creditor to prove that he was unaware of the fraud prior to discharge, this requirement is conspicuously absent from § 727(d)(2).”
• stating that “[w]hile § 727(d)(1) requires a creditor to prove that he was unaware of the fraud prior to discharge, this requirement is conspicuously absent from § 727(d)(2).”
• noting that a knowledge requirement “is conspicuously absent from § 727(d)(2)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).