McCarthy v. Abraham
Citations
- 232 N.E.3d 1272
- 2023 Ohio 4845
Syllabus
In a legal malpractice action, an attorney that provided advice on a refiling deadline in line with relevant, contemporary precedent from the applicable appellate district prior to Wilson v. Durrani, 164 Ohio St.3d 419, 2020-Ohio-6827 did not breach the standard of care he owed to his clients as a matter of law. As a result, summary judgment in favor of the attorney was warranted. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- condemning prosecution's evidence of a defendant's prior similar act as a basis for inferring the intent of a co-defendant
- condemning prosecution’s evidence of a defendant’s prior similar act as a basis for inferring the intent of a co-defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.