McCants v. Glickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the discrimination claim of a plaintiff who “suspected discrimination during [his] interview” accrued on the date of the interview
• finding that discrimination claim of plaintiff who “suspected discrimination during [his] interview” accrued on the date of the interview, although plaintiff waited until more evidence came to light before initiating his administrative proceedings
• denying tolling when plaintiff’s own submissions revealed that he should have at least suspected discrimination earlier when he knew only one other black attorney was employed where he was interviewing
• denying tolling when plaintiff’s own submissions revealed that he should have at least suspected discrimination earlier when he knew only one other black attorney was employed where he was interviewing
• plaintiff was required to contact EEO counselor within 45 days of learning his job interview was unsuccessful, not after receiving “tangible evidence” of discrimination
• “By waiting until he learned this information, Mr. McCants put the USDA in the very position that the time limitations are intended to avoid—that of having to defend against a stale claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).