McCant v. Nissan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a former inmate stated claims of gross negligence resulting from an aggressive body search that caused pain and bruising
• declining to resolve this question because the defendants conceded that an amended complaint naming previously unnamed John Doe defendants could relate back
• holding gender dysphoria is a disability for ADA purposes
• “Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, as we must, [the defendant] did not attempt to comply with the prison’s policy on body searches and thus cannot be said to have exhibited any degree of care toward [the plaintiff].”
• “within the 90-day period, plaintiff’s counsel informed defendants that they would be named in the Amended Complaint”
• quot- ing American Psychiatric Assn., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 77 (rev. 3d ed. 1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).